Working out Nancy Pelosi: She ‘Is conscious of Exactly What Her Leverage Is’

Working out Nancy Pelosi: She ‘Is conscious of Exactly What Her Leverage Is’


That is FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies in lately for Terry Faulty.

When U.S. Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi used to be first elected to Congress, there wasn’t a females’s lavatory near the Home flooring, and it’d be just a few years before females had been allowed to build on pants in the chamber. Things hang changed since then. Pelosi has now led the Democratic Birthday party’s Home caucus for 18 years, and our guest at Time, national political correspondent Molly Ball, says she’s ancient her negotiating abilities to outmaneuver President Trump consistently in coverage battles.

Paul’s new book traces Pelosi’s political abilities back to her roots in her father’s Democratic machine in Baltimore. She describes how Pelosi outworked and outthought male opponents to ascend the management ladder in Congress, why she became basically the most effectively liked target of Republicans in congressional elections and, significantly surprisingly, why she found working with President Obama so refined. Besides her work at Time, Molly Ball is a political analyst for CNN. Previously, she’s reported for The Atlantic, Politico and fairly a pair of media organizations. Her new book is known as “Pelosi.” I spoke with Molly Ball from my dwelling in Philadelphia. She used to be at her dwelling in Arlington, Va.

Successfully, Molly Ball, welcome to FRESH AIR. You are working at dwelling – lawful? – like all people else, with three young people and your husband. And I’m drawn to how reporting in Washington has changed with the pandemic. You understand, this is a metropolis that is perfect paunchy of, you recognize, strategies and rumors and gossip and reports and all kinds of verbal change. Hundreds of it be digital, nonetheless now people can not truly gain collectively. How does it truly feel fairly a pair of?

MOLLY BALL: In actuality, I dispute fairly quite so much of what you refer to in Washington occurs when people circulate – lawful? – when we’re around each fairly a pair of, the newshounds and our sources and the politicians etc. And fairly quite so much of people safe this form of incestuous, nonetheless it surely is, for better or worse, a amazing capability that that invent of gossip network that you just portray is fueled. In sing that is all a small bit more durable, to sustain in contact with people and to invent of know what the scuttlebutt is. But furthermore the form of reporting I manufacture – I’m no longer mainly a Capitol Hill correspondent. I manufacture fairly quite so much of traveling across the nation, meeting people, attempting to, you recognize, look the downside on the bottom with my hang eyes, and that is the rationale completely stopped.

DAVIES: So let’s focus on about Nancy Pelosi. You understand, many other people’s image of Nancy Pelosi is that of a prosperous San Francisco liberal, which she is, nonetheless her political roots are truly very fairly a pair of. Tell us about her background, her family.

BALL: One of her mentors earlier in her career, Jack Murtha, ancient to express about her, gain no longer dispute she’s from San Francisco. She’s from Baltimore. And that’s the rationale each literally fair and fair in a deeper sense, lawful? Her father used to be a congressman from Baltimore after which became the mayor of Baltimore. He got here out of the machine politics of Baltimore, a Democratic metropolis. She used to be born in 1940, when her father used to be already in Congress. So literally from the day she used to be born, she used to be segment of this very Catholic, very Democratic, very Italian family that used to be enraged about the political lifetime of the metropolis and the nation.

And that machine politics, as you recognize from Philadelphia, used to be very mighty about the invent of tribes and factions of the metropolis. The fairly a pair of ethnicities all had their hang small neighborhoods, and all of them had a invent of boss who might maybe suppose their votes, generally in switch for something. So if you happen to appear the form of deal-maker that Nancy Pelosi is, if you happen to appear the form of negotiating that she does on Capitol Hill, I dispute fairly quite so much of it does designate back to her roots in Baltimore.

DAVIES: What about Nancy Pelosi’s mom? Tell us about her.

BALL: Her mom’s most important to her, I dispute no lower than as most important as her father. And one amongst the issues I tried to manufacture in the book used to be invent of restore the significance of her mom to her life. You understand, I dispute inevitably because her father used to be a baby-kisser, her mom invent of gets erased from this legend, nonetheless she used to be very mighty formed by her mom. And she talks very frankly, which I dispute is engaging, about how stifled her mom used to be. Her mom had fairly quite so much of ambitions that she wasn’t ready to meet simply because she used to be a girl. She wished to be an auctioneer. She wished to plod to law faculty. She wished to hang her hang switch. And all of those desires had been thwarted because she had to discontinuance dwelling and lift the young people and abet the dwelling and because, fairly frankly, her husband wouldn’t let her.

There used to be a level where she had a switch. She’d invented and patented a magnificence product, and she or he wished to advertise it nationally. But she wished her husband’s signature in instruct to manufacture that, and he wouldn’t give it to her. So I dispute it formed her that her mom used to be stifled in that scheme. But it furthermore formed her that her mom used to be a extraordinarily solid and aggressive woman, a invent of – I gain no longer must be stereotypical, nonetheless, you recognize, the invent of fiery Italian American mom who – there are family reports about how she as soon as punched a poll employee in the face. She used to be known to – she as soon as build LBJ in his station and suggested off Ronald Reagan. So this used to be no longer any individual who used to be timorous to gain in people’s faces, and I dispute that is surely a characteristic you furthermore look in her daughter.

DAVIES: You understand, and the form of metropolis machine politics that her family used to be enraged about functions – you recognize, it be about loyalty and favors, nonetheless it surely’s furthermore perfect about an awful lot of fascinating work – boulevard lists and incandescent where your votes are and turning them out. And there is fairly quite so much of fascinating work enthusiastic. Nancy Pelosi, then Nancy D’Alesandro, grew up when the machine used to be fairly active. Did she play a feature herself?

BALL: She did. Her mom used to be to blame for a pair of issues in the family as invent of the brains of the political operation. One used to be the Girls folks’s Democratic Membership that operated out of the basement, and they did fairly quite so much of that tricky work you are talking about – pounding the pavement, doing the precincts and guaranteeing all the pieces used to be in the lawful station. After which furthermore the need file, which is the fairly a pair of aspect of what you are talking about, the invent of constituent companies and products operation, where there used to be a checklist that used to be maintained in the family’s lounge of the total issues – the total favors people wished from – whether or no longer it used to be their mayor or their congressman.

And so from the time she used to be about Eleven, Nancy D’Alesandro used to be to blame of being in that lounge and sustaining that desire file, telling people – answering the phone and telling them where they’d maybe plod in the occasion that they wished to gain into metropolis effectively being facility or wished wait on getting housing or any of the invent of govt companies and products. So she used to be a extraordinarily active segment of that operation from a rather early age.

And I dispute the level you create about how fascinating that work is is most important because it be furthermore very particular particular person, lawful? That is politics at a extraordinarily particular particular person level where you recognize each single voter, and you recognize what they care about, and you recognize where they dwell, and you are turning them out precinct by precinct, block by block. So I dispute that that is truly most important to her sense of politics as effectively.

DAVIES: So Nancy grows up, goes to Catholic faculty, goes to university and after all, after college, gets a job in a senator’s place of job, where, ironically, Steny Hoyer, who would later be her No. 2 in Congress for therefore a protracted time, used to be furthermore employed. This used to be invent of the morning time of the feminist wave of the ’60s. Did Nancy look her – Nancy D’Alesandro look herself as a career woman?

BALL: I dispute she did. She, like her mom, wished to plod to law faculty and never ended up doing so. And she did engage this job in the senator’s place of job. But she furthermore met the one who would change into her husband whereas they had been each in college. And so she ended up, kind of like her mom, giving up all of those desires in instruct to change into a housewife.

Now, she never stopped doing her political actions, being active in the Democratic Birthday party, being a volunteer and pushing the stroller whereas distributing leaflets, nonetheless she did not without delay hang a career – after all, did not hang a career until many, a protracted time later, and it be a invent of engaging irony of her life that even though she saw the invent of entice that her mom had fallen into, she ended up doing nearly the identical element after she graduated from college.

DAVIES: So she raised 5 young people nonetheless stayed active in the celebration, held fundraisers at her house. How did she gain into formal politics, into the Democratic Birthday party in California?

BALL: Successfully, her first ever exact place of job – place of job with some invent of energy, with some invent of vote – used to be the San Francisco Library Board in 1975. And I expose this chronicle in the book of how the mayor at the time, Joe Alioto, called her up and asked her to hang interaction this attach on the San Francisco Library Price. And she turned him down. She acknowledged, effectively, you recognize, I’m completely happy being a volunteer. I’m happy to wait on. I gain no longer need that kind of official station. And even though she regarded as him something of a chauvinist, a invent of mature-long-established man, he reprimanded her.

He acknowledged, no. You are doing the work. You could hang something to show for it. You could hang the energy that comes with it. You wish so as to create choices. And this used to be truly a revelation for her. And when she and I talked about it, she described it as a invent of feminist moment where she realized that, yes, she might maybe also composed be ready to hang that kind of energy if she used to be going to be doing the total work. And all the pieces invent of changed for her as soon as she had that official station. She realized that, in particular as a girl, if you happen to had been perfect invent of talking, no one might maybe hear to you. But if you happen to had a vote, they had to admire you. They’d to listen to to your tell.

DAVIES: She gets into Congress in 1987. And no longer many politicians create their first scamper at elected place of job for Congress and have interaction. She, in a system, used to be kind of in the lawful station at the lawful time. A congressman died. His wife took the seat. She acquired colon most cancers and acknowledged that Nancy might maybe also composed scamper for the seat. But she composed had to hang interaction it. It used to be a field of 14 people, along side one which used to be fairly ambitious. How’d she pull it off?

BALL: Successfully, I dispute there are truly fairly fairly quite so much of people in the Congress lately who that is their first place of job. But that is invent of (laughter) one other discussion. But yeah, she did deserve to strive towards for it despite having the deathbed endorsement of her friend, Sala Burton, who’d held the seat before her untimely loss of life of colon most cancers. And she truly did model her operation on the politics that she realized in Baltimore, on counting each vote, on incandescent the neighborhoods block by block and precinct by precinct.

She knew the price of unveiling up. She used to be a tireless campaigner. She’d be up at 5 in the morning waving indicators for the commuters. And she’d be out leisurely at evening, you recognize, speaking at a bingo parlor or a girl’s bridge club. And so her most important opponent used to be a particular person named Harry Britt, who used to be invent of the successor of the infamous Harvey Milk, the tragically assassinated member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. And this used to be at a time when the AIDS disaster used to be truly approaching the national radar.

And if elected, Harry Britt, her opponent, would had been the most most important overtly homosexual man elected to Congress. So fairly quite so much of the marketing campaign used to be about who might maybe better symbolize the homosexual neighborhood. And Nancy Pelosi talked about the total connections she had, her skill to be good in Washington. But her most important opponent’s argument used to be, we want to be represented by one amongst our hang in Congress. And she won rather narrowly. She won – there used to be – it used to be invent of two rounds of balloting. And she won that first spherical by perfect a pair of thousand votes.

DAVIES: The fairly a pair of suited segment of it used to be money, lawful? She raised fairly quite so much of money. And she, at this level, had family wealth to make contributions, too.

BALL: That’s lawful. Her husband used to be a banker and financier. They lived in Unique York for a pair of years before shifting to his station of delivery in San Francisco. And he became fairly right. So even at that point in 1987, they had been fairly effectively-off. And yes, she build somewhat fairly quite so much of her hang money into the bustle to boot to being ready to lift funds. On chronicle of she had this background as a fundraiser, because she’d spent so mighty time raising money for loads of politicians, she used to be then ready to call in fairly quite so much of those favors. And she outspent the total the relaxation of the sphere mixed to hang interaction that bustle.

DAVIES: You write that when she acquired to Congress, she already knew 200 representatives and senators personally and that many owed her a desire. That’s rather vital for a freshman. Why used to be that?

BALL: Or no longer it is very peculiar for a freshman member of Congress. But she had helped so many other people gain to Congress. She had held all of those fundraisers in her dwelling. Her house in San Francisco had change into a invent of effectively-known discontinuance on the fundraising circuit. So no longer perfect San Francisco politicians, nonetheless politicians from all over the place the nation who had been coming thru California to lift money would discontinuance at their dwelling.

She furthermore spent a term as the finance chair of the Democratic Senatorial Advertising and marketing campaign Committee, generally raising money for the total Senate candidates in tricky races in 1986. In sing that meant that she acquired to know fairly quite so much of senators and helped fairly quite so much of them. And fairly quite so much of them grew to admire her thru that and furthermore, maybe, owed her a desire. So – and this used to be exactly what she ran on.

Her slogan when she ran for place of job that first time used to be, a tell that will be heard. And it used to be all about her connections and her skill to be good in Washington, which, if you happen to ponder it, is rather queer for any individual who’s never truly been in place of job before. The truth is, one amongst her marketing campaign consultants regarded at this proposed slogan and acknowledged, wait a minute. We’re going to scamper a first-time candidate on this understanding that they are good and done? And the retort used to be, yes. That’s what we are going to fabricate. And it ended up working.

DAVIES: Molly Ball is the national political correspondent for Time. Her new book is “Pelosi.” We will focus on extra after a ruin. That is FRESH AIR.


DAVIES: That is FRESH AIR. And we’re speaking with Molly Ball. She is the national political correspondent for Time and a political analyst on CNN. Her new book is known as “Pelosi.”

You understand, fairly quite so much of people assist in Congress for a protracted time nonetheless never change into leaders. They’re active on their committees. Nancy Pelosi determined, first, in 1988, she would scamper for one amongst those management posts, a whip. She stayed at it, at final used to be elected the whip. She became the leader of the caucus in 2002. They had been in the minority. So she suggested the submit of minority leader after which at final became speaker in 2007 after the Democrats won the bulk in Congress in 2006. But running for these management posts is a small fairly a pair of from perfect serving in Congress. Tell us how you manufacture it. How did she put collectively to hang interaction these internal battles for management?

BALL: It requires constructing fairly quite so much of beef up amongst your colleagues. So which suggests raising money to your colleagues, campaigning to your colleagues, serving to them gain elected and discontinuance elected. It capability proving that you just’ve the invent of chops to manufacture the job, proving that you just recognize the intelligent info of the coverage, you recognize the vogue the Home works and functions. But it be fairly quite so much of good constructing those relationships.

And curiously, though she got here from the liberal cruise of the caucus, from a rather early level in her career, she used to be constructing relationships with the extra moderate and conservative Democrats in the Home. And she became chums with a invent of crusty, mature chauvinist from Pennsylvania, Jack Murtha, who used to be known for his work on defense spending. And since he saw something in her that made him engage her critically, he became a invent of most important validator for her.

Or no longer it is miles a must-deserve to recollect, when she acquired to the Home in 1987, out of 435 members of the Home, there had been most tasty 23 females. So she wasn’t truly going to gain anyplace by getting the total females in the Home to vote for her. There perfect weren’t that many. She wished to gain the total men to hang interaction her critically. She wished to gain them to perceive her as any individual who might maybe manufacture this job and wasn’t perfect a invent of dilettante, as she used to be generally caricatured. So getting those older and extra conservative and male members to hang interaction her critically and to perceive her as a power to be reckoned with used to be truly most important to her being ready to hang interaction that station.

DAVIES: Simply. And, you recognize, you talked about that in the 2000 congressional election cycle, she donated three.9 million to fairly a pair of Democratic candidates. That’s surely a system to hang interaction fairly quite so much of chums. The fairly a pair of element used to be perfect the sheer level of work and the stamina she confirmed. What had been her days like?

BALL: She has continuously had a truly vital amount of vitality. She would not need fairly quite so much of sleep. I’ve never considered her exhaust a total meal (laughter). She seems to – she would not drink espresso. She would not drink alcohol. She seems to dwell basically on unlit chocolate and chocolate ice cream, which she eats each day. But she has this amazing level of vitality. And she traces fairly quite so much of it to being a mom. And as a mom myself, I title with this a small bit. I dispute you secret agent, if you happen to change into a mom for the most most important time – mighty much less if you happen to’ve got 5 young people – that the amount of capability that you just notion you had perfect will enhance exponentially if you happen to – perfect because it be so mighty work to take care of cramped young people.

And so fairly quite so much of her vitality derived from having been – having had 5 young people in the attach of six years, and having to lift this effectively-kept family. That invent of makes you the leader of a caucus, in a system. And I dispute some of it is perfect pure. I dispute some of it has perfect acquired to be the vogue that she is naturally. I’ve truly asked her this question. I’m surely no longer the most most important to query, effectively, where manufacture you gain all this vitality? How manufacture you manufacture it? And she’ll perfect give you this invent of blank look and dispute, effectively, I’m Italian. We now hang giant stamina. And I dispute she truly believes that she’s perfect genetically obliging for being Italian.

DAVIES: You understand, the fairly a pair of engaging element is about having – raising a effectively-kept family and, like, being a pacesetter in a congressional caucus is, you recognize, you discontinuance up having to be very, very atmosphere neatly-behaved along with your time and gain issues accomplished and but hang huge patience to take care of those that dispute they’re most important and might maybe throw tantrums and must be sorted.

BALL: That’s lawful. Whenever you happen to ponder it, politicians and small toddlers hang a lot generally, lawful?

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BALL: They’re egomaniacs. They’re self-centered. They’re unreasonable. They need all the pieces and they wish it now. And to boot they are no longer truly drawn to hearing why you hang to gain – you need to them to manufacture something else. So I manufacture dispute that managing a caucus is a lot like managing a effectively-kept family. And I dispute she did study a lot from that. And, you recognize, a friend of Nancy Pelosi’s, when she used to be composed a youngish mom, acknowledged she knew she used to be destined for success in politics when she saw all 5 young people folding their hang laundry.

And the vogue she ran the dwelling used to be disciplined. It used to be atmosphere neatly-behaved. It used to be, you recognize, her – she infrequently ever – I hang a fascinating time believing this. But her young people dispute she infrequently ever had to scold them because she would perfect give them that icy glare of disappointment. And the disgrace that they would truly feel for disappointing her used to be enough to create them behave. And so I dispute you look that in the vogue she manages the Home Democratic Caucus as effectively, that she would not generally deserve to bring the hammer down and truly punish people because they’re perfect so timorous of disappointing her.

DAVIES: Molly Ball is political correspondent for Time and an analyst for CNN. Her new book is “Pelosi.” She’ll be back to chat extra about Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s career after a ruin. And Kevin Whitehead critiques a new album by saxophonist Dayna Stephens’ trio. I’m Dave Davies, and this is FRESH AIR.


DAVIES: That is FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies in for Terry Faulty. We’re speaking with Time national political correspondent Molly Ball, who’s written a book about U.S. Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Ball says Pelosi has ancient her political skill and negotiating abilities to outmaneuver President Trump in just a few coverage battles. Ball’s book is known as “Pelosi.”

You understand, for the most most important just a few years that Nancy Pelosi used to be the leader of the Democratic caucus, she used to be there when the Democrats had been in a minority, and so it used to be a matter of getting basically the most she might maybe with Republicans who had been to blame. And likewise you expose a different of reports. One that involves mind is when Tom DeLay, the congressman from Texas, called her to express that they had to crop the different of Democrats on one amongst the committees after this had all been agreed to. And she truly confirmed some backbone. How did she retort to him?

BALL: I like this solution. I like what she acknowledged to him when he suggested her that he used to be going to plod back on this agreement she’d made with the Republican speaker at the time. She acknowledged, life on this planet as you recognize it is miles maybe no longer the identical if you happen to persist on this belief. So she used to be very mighty laying down a marker that acknowledged – and they tried to argue with her. They acknowledged, oh, we will plod out and badmouth you in the media if you happen to manufacture this. She acknowledged, I gain no longer care. They acknowledged, effectively, truly, no, this is better for you. You gain a greater percentage of the seats if the committee is smaller. She acknowledged, I gain no longer care. We had an agreement. We’re sticking to the agreement. And life as you recognize it is miles maybe no longer the identical if you happen to persist on this belief.

So from the very starting attach, she used to be a extraordinarily tricky leader. She used to be a extraordinarily solid leader. I dispute she considered the leaders who’d approach before her as being a small bit former-willed and letting people gain away with too mighty. And so at diverse facets as minority leader before turning into speaker, fairly quite so much of what she used to be doing used to be attempting to instill a system of celebration self-discipline and wake up the Democratic caucus to the premise that they wished to work as a unit in the occasion that they had been going to hang any kind of leverage in negotiations with the bulk. And it is composed, I dispute, the No. 1 element that she says to and about her caucus lately. She says, our diversity is our power. Our solidarity is our energy.

DAVIES: And we acquired to work as a crew. It truly is engaging because if you happen to are in the minority, you hang to know how a long way you shall be ready to push, lawful? I mean, and segment of that involves incandescent the circumstances in which the Republican leaders will need some Democratic votes because their hang caucus used to be restive and some of them wouldn’t affiliate with management. And so it be one element to be tricky and show steel, nonetheless to manufacture it effectively, you genuinely deserve to hang accomplished the homework and know exactly where you stand, where the votes are, lawful?

BALL: That’s lawful. And I dispute the fairly a pair of invent of approved discover in Nancy Pelosi’s vocabulary is leverage. She continuously knows where those strain facets are, knows exactly what her leverage is. Once in a whereas it be that, as you dispute, the opposition is split, and which means that if the Democrats are unified, they’ve fairly quite so much of leverage since the bulk wants their votes. One other element is perfect incandescent what the priorities are. So in fairly quite so much of the negotiations with the Republican majority in the previous couple of years, she knew that they wished to amplify defense power spending. So in instruct to gain that, she used to be going to require them to amplify some domestic spending or to defend a pair of domestic spending that the Democrats cared about. So incandescent those strain facets, incandescent what it is your opponent values in the negotiation, enables her to to maximize that leverage.

After which perfect the truth that she is so good – it becomes a invent of virtuous cycle, I guess you would dispute, that because she’s so right at maintaining the Democratic caucus united, it presents her fairly quite so much of credibility in that negotiation to express, I’m in a position to bring along all of my votes. Are you able to manufacture that? On chronicle of I have not considered you manufacture that, nonetheless you’ve got considered me manufacture that a lot.

DAVIES: In 2006, the Democrats gain the bulk in Congress. She then becomes speaker the next January. After which in 2008, Barack Obama wins the White Home. And Pelosi is speaker at a time when the Democrats regulate the White Home and each homes of Congress. And likewise you’ve got got a president with an ambitious coverage agenda. And there had been issues they took on like the Affordable Care Act. But it be engaging that you just write that one amongst the toughest issues for her used to be dealing with President Obama. What used to be fascinating about that?

BALL: I gain no longer dispute she would dispute that he used to be fascinating to take care of. I dispute she – they – the 2 of them became very shut. And she cherished that relationship very mighty. And I dispute he got here to admire her as effectively. But this used to be a overall chorus all the scheme thru the Obama administration from Democrats in the Home and Senate. They perfect never felt that Obama used to be fully engaged with the Congress and knew his scheme across the Congress. Having most tasty been a senator for a pair of years, never having been in the Home and, you recognize, no longer being the invent of schmoozer who’s continuously having people over to the White Home and wining and eating representatives etc, fairly quite so much of the Home Democrats had been generally frustrated with President Obama’s negotiating abilities, felt that he used to be giving freely too mighty on the front discontinuance and wasn’t maximizing leverage. So if you happen to’ll be ready to take into consideration, if you happen to are any individual like Nancy Pelosi who values leverage, that goes to be extraordinarily frustrating.

DAVIES: Simply. Successfully, and she or he used to be frustrated, as many in Congress had been, that the Obama administration would favor Congress to after all draft most of those truly serious items of guidelines, nearly as if – I dispute you write – the Democrats in Congress felt that the Obama crew wished to gain credit for these coverage initiatives nonetheless no longer gain their fingers dirty in truly doing the work of making issues happen. After which I guess the fairly a pair of element used to be that Obama tended to dispute he used to be going to gain Republican beef up. And she would expose him, no, they’re going to string you along after which vote towards you after which blame Democrats for all the pieces that goes glum.

BALL: That’s lawful. She had had fairly quite so much of expertise watching how the Republicans did switch and had change into, I dispute, rather precisely cynical about their willingness to work in a bipartisan model. So rather mighty from the starting attach, you recognize, you talked about that Obama got here in with this ambitious coverage agenda. He furthermore, unnecessary to dispute, got here in with a crashing financial system. And so the most most important instruct of switch used to be to are trying to manufacture something about that. And Obama truly did dispute that since the downside used to be so dire and because he had scamper on this message of invent of uniting the nation and because he got here in with this very solid popularity, he notion that he might maybe gain some Republican beef up.

But the Republicans rather mighty determined at the outset that that used to be something they had been no longer going to manufacture. And Nancy Pelosi became a precious foil for them, in segment because Obama used to be so standard, lawful? And to boot they’d maybe continuously dispute, effectively, you recognize, we like Obama intelligent, nonetheless Nancy Pelosi and the Washington Democrats, they are the difficulty here. They’re the ones entering into the vogue. They’re the ones who might maybe not work with us. And it wasn’t fair. She would’ve been prepared to work across the aisle if she believed that they had been truly going to take care of her. But she furthermore wasn’t naive enough to dispute that they had been completely right in all of their protestations.

DAVIES: What used to be Nancy Pelosi’s feature in getting the Affordable Care Act passed?

BALL: She used to be truly instrumental to its passage, and I gain no longer dispute that her feature has been fully liked. Many of the histories of the Affordable Care Act hang centered on President Obama or hang centered on the downside of getting it thru the Senate. But she used to be key to getting it thru the Home. And no longer most tasty that – when the Democrats lost their 60-vote majority in the Senate and had to after all delivery from scratch, there had been fairly quite so much of people in the White Home in the Obama administration who wished to provide up, who notion that this perfect wasn’t going to be imaginable. It used to be too effectively-kept a hill to climb, and it used to be taking a look politically poisonous as effectively, and maybe they’re going to also composed toggle back their ambitions and check out for something a small bit smaller, something that wouldn’t be truly approved nonetheless would maybe perfect amplify the different of young individuals with effectively being insurance. And Nancy Pelosi used to be the one who in that meeting turned to President Obama and acknowledged, Mr. President, I do know there are people urging you to hang interaction what she called the namby-pamby approach, and she or he used to be the one who stiffened his backbone. Now, the president and his people will expose you that he never went wobbly, though there is some evidence that maybe he did, nonetheless she used to be the one who acknowledged, I’m going to can wait on you create this happen. Let’s no longer back down. We hang now approach too a long way. Seeking to gain some invent of approved gain entry to to effectively being care used to be something that the Democrats had been attempting to manufacture for the greater segment of a century, and they had been so shut, and she or he used to be no longer going to let him give up at that moment.

DAVIES: Molly Ball is national political correspondent for Time. Her new book is known as “Pelosi.” We will proceed our conversation after this rapid ruin. That is FRESH AIR.


DAVIES: That is FRESH AIR. We’re speaking with Molly Ball. She’s national political correspondent for Time and a political analyst for CNN. Her new biography of Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi is known as “Pelosi.”

So the Democrats lost regulate of Congress in 2010. That made Nancy Pelosi now minority leader. After which in 2016, Donald Trump surprises all people by a success the presidential election. She’s acquired a new president she’ll deserve to take care of. So how did she put collectively dealing with him? What approach did she engage?

BALL: Successfully, you hang to recollect that, first of all, no one, along side Donald Trump, expected him to hang interaction that election in 2016. So it used to be fairly a jolt to all people in politics, Nancy Pelosi included. And, furthermore, no one knew what to request from him as president because he had acknowledged so many conflicting issues in instruct to gain elected, had had so many fairly quite so much of personas from invent of conservative Republican to liberal Unique York Democrat. And he’d sold himself concurrently as this fighter for the lawful and furthermore as this deal-maker. And, after all, people – fairly quite so much of those that voted for him saw him as extra moderate than Hillary Clinton, any individual who would be ready to work across the aisle.

So being the effects-oriented, operational particular individual that she is, Nancy Pelosi did no longer declare fairly quite so much of time improving from the shock of Donald Trump’s election. She without delay started to ponder, how can I take care of him? And to boot they acquired on the phone, and he acknowledged some very tremendous issues to her. And her very first notion, though, used to be, I favor to defend the Affordable Care Act, because she knew that with Republicans, the very most tasty element that had stopped Republicans from repealing the Affordable Care Act before used to be that President Obama would’ve vetoed it. But now that they had the bulk in each homes of Congress and the presidency, it used to be a extraordinarily exact possibility. So she without delay kicked into high equipment attempting to create certain the Affordable Care Act would no longer be repealed. And that used to be her very first precedence.

DAVIES: In 2018, the Democrats retook Congress with a new wave of enthusiasm and a new wave of females running for place of job and being elected to Congress. This presented a downside for Nancy Pelosi. I mean, there had been fairly quite so much of new people in Congress who did not know her as effectively, and she or he and the fairly a pair of two top leaders in Congress had been all of their 70s and there used to be a riot of kinds. What glad her she might maybe also composed discontinuance on? How did she take care of this?

BALL: She acknowledged after the 2016 election that if Hillary Clinton had won, she might maybe need stepped down, she might maybe need retired because there would be a girl at the desk. Being the very most tasty woman leader – top leader of both celebration in Congress or the White Home, she has spent most of her career being the very most tasty woman at the desk when the president meets with the tip leaders of Congress, and she or he believes that that is truly most important. So some people gain no longer dispute she truly would’ve stepped down. She surely has a prolonged sage of refusing to step down, even after a loss. But she did dispute that she would’ve regarded as that and that she stayed in effectively-kept segment because she believed there wished to be a girl at that negotiating desk.

After which furthermore, perfect her capabilities as a negotiator, seeing what the Democrats had been going to be up towards with the Republicans in energy in each homes of Congress and the White Home, believing that they wished basically the most tremendous particular person in those negotiations and believing that that used to be her.

DAVIES: After the Democrats took regulate of the Home in 2018 after which Pelosi would soon be speaker all every other time, she had exact leverage in dealing with Donald Trump, which didn’t happen in the most most important two years of his term. How did issues switch? There used to be an early meeting at which she made fairly a assertion.

BALL: That’s lawful. Quickly after that 2018 election, you bear in mind there used to be this high-stakes budget negotiation occurring between the 2 occasions that resulted in a govt shutdown. And before that, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer went to the White Home to meet with the president. And Trump, as he’s accomplished in a pair of of those settings, determined to ask the press to discontinuance and movie this negotiation that they notion used to be going to be non-public. And at one level, they’re going backward and forward about issues like the border wall and whether or no longer the govt.s going to shut down.

And Trump, invent of nearly as an apart, says, effectively, you recognize, Nancy’s acquired a fascinating time lawful now because she would not hang fairly quite so much of beef up in her hang celebration. He’s referring to the management strive towards that she used to be in to assemble the speakership. And she without delay cuts him off, would not let him win and says, Mr. President, please gain no longer symbolize the power that I bring to this meeting as the leader of the Home Democrats.

So she used to be interrupting him. She used to be striking him in his station. She used to be refusing to be invent of insulted in that scheme. And I dispute that made a giant influence. But what made an even better influence used to be when she and Senator Schumer walked out of that meeting, walked out the doorways of the White Home. And she build on that reddish-orange coat and those spherical tortoiseshell sun shades and perfect grinned a suited grin.

And there is an – that image of that moment invent of without delay became iconic as the epitome of the woman who might maybe build Trump in his station. And since there used to be this wave of females’s political activism that started with Trump’s election and has continued ever since, because there is so mighty enrage on the left toward Trump and the Trump administration, I dispute that image without delay caught fire as invent of the fighter that Democrats wished, the decide who they felt might maybe finally truly rise up for them and withstand Trump. And that’s the rationale been her station ever since.

DAVIES: You understand, it be engaging. You create the level a lot in the book of how results-oriented she is, you recognize? It’s no longer always truly – would not matter whether or no longer you gain no longer like me or whether or no longer you create enjoyable of me in public if we gain most important issues accomplished for the American people – and perfect tries no longer to gain enraged about the total emotional stuff that might maybe gain in the vogue. That acknowledged, did you ever look her lose her mood?

BALL: There is a small-known incident that is a ideally qualified illustration of this from 2014. So she’s minority leader at present. The Republicans are as much as scamper of the Home. And there is some speeches occurring, as they generally are, on the flooring of the Home. And a Republican member of Congress, Tom Marino, starts invent of taunting her. He’s announcing, you recognize, you would’ve mounted immigration if you happen to had been as much as scamper, Madam Speaker. But you did not manufacture it. And he’s insulting her intelligence. He’s insulting her capability.

So he gets accomplished speaking. And likewise you shall be ready to after all look, in a partial scheme, on, like, the C-SPAN recording of this, you shall be ready to appear her marching across the flooring, chasing him down and wagging her finger at him. And what she’s announcing is, you would also very effectively be a trifling particular person. You are a trifling particular person. And he recounted this later invent of afraid that she – and her colleagues nearly had to drag her a long way off from him because she used to be so incensed by what he’d accused her of.

DAVIES: I’m wondering if you happen to’ll be ready to dispute us a small bit about how she’s going to take care of the challenges presented by the coronavirus pandemic. I mean, there are wise challenges. How does the Home feature? How are you able to declare oversight over the executive branch with out public hearings and workers being on look? How manufacture you vote? What manufacture you look?

BALL: Yeah. Clearly, it be a giant public coverage downside. And it be furthermore a giant logistical downside. And I gain no longer dispute the Congress has figured out both segment of that but. She’s been enraged about the negotiations toward these four wide bills that hang already been passed, spending nearly $three trillion to are trying to sustain, you recognize, staff and companies and the effectively being care machine afloat. And the work there might be not any longer accomplished. I dispute she regards that as a partial success. She composed thinks that extra desires to be accomplished.

And in terms of the logistics, you recognize, the Home is a extraordinarily mature-long-established station. And there had been some efforts to are trying to determine out a system for them to meet remotely or manufacture something else. And that kind of acquired poleaxed bipartisanship, you would dispute, where the Republicans wouldn’t comply with it. And it be change into this full highly charged political strive towards, as fully all the pieces is lately.

So we will look. We now hang, you recognize, the Senate coming back this week. The Home is speculated to approach back in some model subsequent week. And it will seemingly be a exact downside to perceive whether or no longer they’re going to put collectively these two simultaneous issues, each the coverage state – this is a Congress that wasn’t functioning in particular effectively before they had to discontinuance dwelling and build on masks – and furthermore the uncommon logistical issues of the virus.

DAVIES: Molly Ball, thanks so mighty for spending a whereas with us.

BALL: Thanks so mighty for having me.

DAVIES: Molly Ball is national political correspondent for Time and an analyst for CNN. Her new book is “Pelosi.” Coming up, Kevin Whitehead critiques a new album by saxophonist Dayna Stephens’ trio. He says their improvised grace seems oddly relevant now. That is FRESH AIR.


Copyright © 2020 NPR. All rights reserved. Talk to our web page terms of employ and permissions pages at for further records.

NPR transcripts are created on a scamper closing date by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced the employ of a proprietary transcription activity developed with NPR. This textual affirm material is maybe no longer in its final invent and shall be up up to now or revised in some unspecified time in the future. Accuracy and availability might maybe also fluctuate. The authoritative sage of NPR’s programming is the audio sage.

Author Image